January 26, 2004

  • Opened a can of worms, eh?
    Responses to some of the comments (in italics), and hoping for some continued discussion.

    #1.
    I see why you may think this is so stupid, and when legal action is taken, it definitely is. 
    However.
    The honor roll sucks for smart people, too.  It makes the school out to be like a communist labor camp. These awards are like incentive for people to work, and rather than focusing on the student, they end up treating human beings like mindless cattle; focusing on grades rather than how well they actually understand information.  Instead of “hey, good job,” I get “hey, let me see your homework so I can copy it.  You don’t want to give it to me?  You fucking cunt I hate you.”  So in a case like this, I’d much rather not have an honor roll.  My grades are my business.
    Posted 1/25/2004 at 8:34 PM by Beelzebub

    i disagree. the reason students are treated like cattle and with a communistic work camp attitude is because of the student to teacher ration(sic)(EDIT – i originally meant “ratio”). smaller class size would lead to a more human approach to teaching and the relationship in general. as it is, most teachers are underpaid and over worked; it’s no puzzle why most of them don’t give a shit.
    Posted 1/25/2004 at 9:23 PM by saturnalia

    When it comes to grades, the only objective is seeing a 100 on the paper.  Students will do anything to get that, whether it be by studying or by cheating.  And the only reason why is to please mommy and daddy, to make the transcript look nice, or both.  How well the student understands the lesson is not even taken into consideration.  I have consistently placed in the top 5 throughout my four years… either because I’m smart or most likely because I’m surrouned by jackasses.  I am perhaps the laziest person on the planet yet I manage to maintain an A average.  Some kids just learn better than others, it’s that simple.  If I get a C on a test it’s not normal.  People assume that something’s wrong at home, I’m just not myself, etc.  Since everyone knows my business, it’s expected of me to do well.  My point is that the concept of the honor roll is entirely fucked up and should be eliminated not because of the stupid kids who suck and do nothing but bitch about it, but for the well-being of those who do well, and who want to succeed, without having the entire school population knowing their personal information.
    Posted 1/26/2004 at 7:48 AM by Beelzebub

    grades themselves are a measure of the students work throughout the year. final testing is a measure of how well the student understand the concepts taught to them. in theory, that is. it sounds like you have more of a problem with students being taught to regurgitate facts, and being taught WHAT to think rather than HOW to think (something i agree with) and your own privacy concerns.

    #2
    I don’t really see the correlation to the KV story. They illustrate two different points. KV was painting a portrait of an extreme communist society. Everyone is exactly equal, and trying to achieve personal success is sin.
    Eliminating the honor roll is not about keeping all students equal, rather an attempt at placating parents and trying to keep their childrens feelings from being hurt, resulting in frivolous lawsuits.
    This is more a study in how our lawsuit-happy, greed-driven society can manipulate our schools and our students right to recognition.
    Posted 1/26/2004 at 8:45 AM by suede1976

    You drew the correlation yourself; “Everyone is exactly equal, and trying to achieve personal success is a sin.” That quote is exactly the correlation. In the story, having any kind of advantage, whether inborn or learned is against the law. In the news report, they want to do away with the honor roll because it makes the kids who haven’t made the roll feel bad. What kind of retarded (and I mean retarded in the truest dictionary definition) logic is that? “You shouldn’t be acknowledged for your success because it makes others feel bad”, is what they’re (the news story) essentially saying, which is what the essence of the story is.

    #3
    and the honor roll…    some kids have to work hard to get on the honor roll and to some kids it just comes natuarally. ive made the honor roll once or twice when i actually worked but usually im too lazy and i dont give a damn…  but theres no reason for it, it just makes all the other kids who dont make it look incredibly stupid
    Posted 1/26/2004 at 2:33 PM by dreamingxsilently

    i disagree. the kids who look incredibly stupid look so because they make themselves look that way. you said it yourself; you’ve made the honor roll when you tried but you’re too lazy to try, so you don’t make it on the roll. now, i’m not saying you’re stupid, i’m saying the reason you don’t make it on is because you’re lazy (again, you said it yourself).
    Posted 1/26/2004 at 3:04 PM by saturnalia

    ADDENDUM:
    like i said in the previous post, most kids just need to get off their lazy ass and do some homework. and, no, it doesn’t make them look incredibly stupid in the least. like smarticus said, it’s a congratulatory pat on the back for hard work done and achievements earned.

    #4
    your fuckin sit sux! so does mine but damn!!! your fugly too.
    Posted 1/26/2004 at 5:11 PM by The_Choosen_Gothic_1

    hey, thanks for your intelligent, informed opinion. my response to you is start using dictionary.com (it’s free!), spell check (it’s also free!) and psychiatric help (sadly, this isn’t free).

Comments (29)

  • I’m sorry if I come off sounding like a total unfeeling dick, I tend to be bluntly honest..
    I am so sick and tired of everyone wanting to make things “fair”. Fuck fair. Here’s a little wake up; Life isn’t fair. Get over it. If you want something, work your ass off for it, don’t sit there and piss and moan about how everything is unfair. Jesus on a skateboard it’s sad. If you are intelligent enough, work hard enough, to get honor roll kudos to you, you deserve it. If you aren’t or don’t, oh well, that’s how the cookie crumbles.

    My older daughter put it best when she told my youngest daughter:

    Life’s tough, get a helmet.

  • Ha! Love your last response there.  I made the honor roll off and on during my education, probably equal amounts.  I knew when I would and wouldn’t make it, it all depended on my work, whether I did enough to get by or I did the best I could.  Sadly, ‘work’ is not in the vocabulary of most students today.

  • #4 was too funny. Way too funny.

  • what about my comment on dinner rolls Rich?

  • crap. I need psychiatric help. too bad it isn’t free.

    the honor roll in certain schools is indeed flawed (meaning the honor roll in my school is flawed). half of the people who are on it are in lower level classes, simply so that they can attain that A. I know of plenty of students that are in higher level classes, that choose to do more so that they can look better for college, but end up getting Bs and Cs as a result. Sure, they could be on the Honor Roll, sure they could be getting As and Bs, but they’re still in the harder classes. There’s a certain amount of irony in that my school doesn’t weight grades.

    I, on the other hand, am lucky. Our honor roll doesn’t kick people out, so once I made it in, I was in. That said, the honor roll is by no means a measure of my academic success. I do honestly believe that I try (in some classes at least) and yet I still yield less than stellar grades. That still doesn’t mean I don’t know how to think. But it doesn’t matter, because I don’t think in the ways they want me to think it, so I just sit and suck up the crappy grades. My grades are much less a reflection of my personal success than they used to be… So I’m more or less okay with being a less than stellar student.

  • Fascinating as always. 

    And yay for the Dictionary.com referral.  I love that site. 

  • ok, so i disagree with you here on a couple of points. as a child who made straight a’s for a very very long time with absolutely no effort on my part, i think the honor roll is a stupid idea to have forced upon you. make note of the terminology there though.

    honoring me for just being inherently smart is unfair to other students. now if i had worked my ass off for those marks and was damn proud of them and wanted the recognition that was coming to me that would be different entirely.

    i remember as a kid feeling ashamed when someone would congratulate me on making the honor roll, because there was nothing i’d done to get there, nothing that was worthy of my pride. i also felt pity for kids who were struggling to maintain a c average through hours and hours of study a night that would ask me how i did it, could i teach them, would i tutor them. fuck no i can’t teach you to be smarter and i have no desire to tutor you – i don’t do my homework, why would you think i want to do yours?

    so as a concept, maybe it’s a good idea, but as a reality, it’s somewhat lacking. now, back to the phrasing up there. i do think a selective honor roll like they were talking about in the article is acceptable, if not ideal. that way kids and parents who don’t want their child’s achievements publicized don’t have to.

    the only problem that makes it not quite ideal is that even in the best circumstances kids and parents don’t always agree on stuff; so the poor child may beg to have their name left off the list while the parent(s) think it’s a wonderful tradition and never hear a word the child says. but yeah, i definitely do not think it should just be an automatic thing whether you want it or not – they’re making the assumption that they know what’s best and that they can predict what works for every student’s situation and that’s an absurd assumption to make.

    also, point number 2, which i sort of mentioned in passing already – there are kids in existence who can spend every spare second working on homework and studies and things to improve memory and intelligence and anything else you can think of . . . and still only make c’s. should they be made to feel that they’re inferior or worthless because they can’t get onto the stupid ‘honor’ roll? no! in fact, they’re far better and more deserving of ‘honor’ than kids like me who got there by being born smart. these kids are working their little butts off to get where they are and they’re still receiving the message that that’s just not good enough. now what the hell does that say about us as a society and our standards??

  • I’m a curious person. I thought to myself, “Who the hell is this poser goth kid flaming my pal Saturnalia?? I bet their blog is all black with glowing letters.” So I checked. Sure ’nuff.

    I got on the honor roll for being a double-agent superspy.

  • sadly when this generation gets to the real world, they will be in for a big suprise. people at work get promotions/ awards for efforts put forth. what will happen when these kids get jobs? will they sue the companies they work for because it makes them feel bad that they didn’t get a promotion/ award but their fellow employee did? God our legal system is a big joke!!!

  • ***PROPS***
    that’s all I can say; you rule just for putting this out there!

  • I agree, honor roll is worth having for those who can make the grade. Sure, some people may cheat their way to the top, but for the people who worked their way up through studying, why take away a standard to work for?

    All through school, a good friend of mine was like one commenter above who naturally excelled in tests and the like without studying. I, on the other hand, needed to study my ass off in order to maintain decent grades in honors classes. Sure, there were times I didn’t make the honor roll, but it never made me feel stupid. It only became incentive to work harder.

    And I agree with spygirl1975 — if people don’t realize they need to work harder to excel and compete in the working world or higher education, then they better learn to accept the bottom of the barrel or mediocre at best.

  • What kind of parent threatens legal action against the honor roll just because their kid wasn’t on it? What’s next–stop keeping score at high school football games? Now that’s something that will never happen. Thanks for the heads-up–scary but interesting.

  • Mmm… yummy debate.

  • yes, but the “real” world is hard whether you’re prepared for it or not. shouldn’t kids get to enjoy being kids as long as they possibly can? are we supposed to encourage them to start competing against each other when they’re in elementary? in kindergarten? “go junior, smack that other kid out of the way, that’s your crayon!” i understand that competition and a system of awards and recognition is to be expected in corporate society, but do we have to force-feed it to our children at such an early age?

    it’s going to be hard enough for some of them when they are overlooked for a promotion they were qualified for or passed over for an award in their jobs later in life. and i’m not meaning to go into harrison bergeron mode here — i’ve read it, it was horrifying. i’m all for recognition for kids if they want it, but there should be some sort of system that if certain kids genuinely have no desire for it, then they can opt out; and kids that do want it, it’ll be the same as always.

  • Personally I think this is all about something called summative assessment. We get a mark and we make comparisons or judgements based on those marks. I work in a private school for boys where competition is fierce, and relying on purely summative data is insufficient. For a start, you’re talking about a result taken on one day or a sample of days, rather than the overall picture of who that student is and how they learn.

    We provide assessment in the form of exams, but we also provide portfolios of their work each term to their parents, as well as formative assessment. The best example of formative assessment is working through an exercise with a child and giving them constructive feedback as they work. That, really, is what learning is all about. Freedom of fear from mistakes and having the opportunity to learn from them. Summative assessment is a way of tracking data, but is not the whole picture by any means.

    There is a place for comparing or rewarding individuals for their academic achievements, but the system falls down if the personal qualities and effort that individuals put in is not equally rewarded. For instance, a top track athlete may win a majority of trophies but not the top trophy that includes achivement as well as attitude, spirit and sportsmanship, if they are not an embodiment of those qualities. Effort awards for improvement or hard work should be noted as well as first in class or honour rolls.

    What it all boils down to, is that every system has its disadvantages. If you are not winning, then the system that focusses solely on the winners is not of benefit to you. Students are motivated by success and should receive encouragement at each level of the achievement spectrum, even if in the end the categories for a tangible reward result in specific criteria such as percentage marks or measurable achievement improvement.

    People should be educated about the relevance of the assessments used to rank or rate individuals. For children especially, winning or competition can be extremely stressful situations that need to be tactfully handled according to age appropriate situations. What we shouldn’t do, is ignore the best as well as the rest, and expect one system to suit all.

    I work with children who have learning disabilities, by the way.

  • you are not fugly. you are a sexy beast. so poo poo on them. poo poo, i say.

  • Yes yes…sexy beast.

    And wicked smart too.

    Good stuff my man…lots of free thinking running amok.

  • I’ve always made good grades in high school, and now college. From that standpoint, I’d just like to say, I do it for me, because it feels good to do the best I can. I don’t do it for the grade or the honors. Furthermore, I never thought that students who didn’t make the honor-roll were stupid. I just always believed that we can all do what we set our minds to do. Who views non honor-roll students as stupid? Certainly not the honors students (at least not all of them). Maybe the problem is that the non honors students know they can do better, and if it bothers them, why shouldn’t they just do it?

  • I personally find it odd, how the very institution that teaches us the foundations of democracy is a complete dictatorship.

  • I can say that being on the honour roll did not help me in my reality life to date … I might be super smart in academic circles but in reality and the paths I chose, I can safely say I am super dumb!

    I hated being recognised for things at school, just like mel said above me … I hated it, I never tried, i did not need to try …

    I really wish they could work out a system so the kids who really try get recognised, not for being supersmart, just for getting out there and trying … The honour roll gives some kids an un-needed inflation of their ego … There is enough arrogance in the world as is …

  • can of worms indeed… poor thing
    cheers
    ~sailor michelle aka shalaigne

  • I never made the honor roll, yet I was one of the smartest students in the school. No one really cared if they didn’t make the honor roll, and parents didn’t freak out like that.

    And yes, you are quite the opposite of fugly.

  • Grades themselves are a measure of how well a person can reiterate what they memorize from a textbook.  The problem with the education here is that it’s state-run instead of having a federal curriculum.  It’s understandable, because this place is so big, and also because a wheat farmer in the midwest doesn’t really need to know advanced calculus like how a physicist in an urban setting does.  And this contributes to why kids in smaller countries like Albania and South Korea are “smarter” than kids here–because of nationwide standards for education.  I’m glad we see eye to eye about the thinking thing, because teaching for a test sucks ass, and pretty much anyone who has taken a NY Regents exam can back me up on this.

  • Ah, this [and your fantastic photography] is why I love your site!

    Aesop’s Fable: The Grasshopper and The Ant (as applied to my life…)
     
    I was an average student and who worked hard to make good grades in high school and made the honor roll most of the time. My younger brother has a genius IQ. He never bothered with homework in high school and received poor marks. My parents let it slide because he had a near perfect SAT score by the 10th grade.

    That all changed in college and beyond. I worked three jobs to pay for tuition. I continued to study hard and then I worked hard – 80 hour weeks in my field for twelve years before starting my own business. I now work six months out of the year and make the same amount of money that I enjoyed as an executive (I could make more money but I’d rather enjoy life.) My brother’s poor study habits continued in college and he is still fucking around in his 30s working on his undergrad. He’s pissed that his employer (he works part time) won’t pay him what he’s “worth” and he often bitches about being underpaid… even though he is reimbursed for his tuition through his employer.

    Working hard isn’t all about money and capitalism – it’s about creating a foundation for yourself. Whether you work on Wall Street or for the Peace Corps — hard work begets success. The truth is life rewards hard work. The sooner we learn it, the better off we are. I’ve never had a client who said “Gee, your presentation wasn’t very good but I don’t want to hurt your feelings! Here’s the $10,000 you wanted.”  ~tc

  • A postscript: (I bet you’re really sick of me now, huh?)

    The reason why I’m so vehemently opposed to the honor system is because at my school, instead of posting a list of kids in alphabetical order on a piece of paper that just says they have a B+ average or above, they post papers EVERYWHERE with EVERYONE’s name AND their average, which is why I feel it’s a violation of my privacy, because it is.  The former I have no problem with; the latter gets on my fucking nerves.

  • This is getting ridiculous, this equality business is getting completely out of hand. Everything has to be “politically correct” and we’re all so damn afraid of hurting each other’s feelings or making someone look bad we’re twisting the system to try to protect everyone. The trouble is, that doesn’t work. Someone’s feelings will always be hurt, someone will always be in second place, someone will always be offended, no matter how hard we try to avoid it.

    I loved the story. But it’s stories like that and 1984 that make me wonder about what the hell our society is coming to.

  • LOL.. I want judge :) Have a great week!

    Hugs2u, Amy

  • tastes like cotton fluff, pink flavoured. now, i laugh.

Post a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *